Publications
Dataset:
Katalin Kelemen (2024). Nordic CONREASON collection of data on constitutional reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts (Version 1) [Data set]. Örebro University. Available at: https://doi.org/10.60689/zmk7-0z14
Published:
Maija Dahlberg, ’Perustuslain tulkinta Suomen ylimmissä tuomioistuimissa: empiirinen ja oikeusvertaileva tutkimus’ [Interpretation of the Constitution by the Finnish Supreme Courts: An empirical and comparative study], in 7-8 Lakimies 957 (2024) – open access: https://journal.fi/lakimies/article/view/147377
Maija Dahlberg, Haukur Logi Karlsson and Katalin Kelemen, ‘The Nordic Courts: An Example of Cooperation and Dialogue’, in Constitutional Review in Western Europe: Judicial-Legislative Relations in Comparative Perspective 288-312 (Kálmán Pócza ed., Routledge 2024) – book chapter, not open access
Nicklas Pettersson and Katalin Kelemen, ‘Yet Another Case of Nordic Exceptionalism?: A Quantitative Approach to an Intra-Nordic and an International Comparison of Supreme Courts’ Constitutional Reasoning’ (Örebro University School of Business 2024) Working Paper (Statistics) 7/2024 – open access: https://swopec.hhs.se/oruesi/abs/oruesi2024_007.htm
Accepted for publication (forthcoming):
Maija Dahlberg and Katalin Kelemen, ‘Constitutional law in the Finnish Supreme Courts – the role of preparatory works and precedents in constitutional interpretation’, in 1 Retfaerd (2025) (accepted) – open access
Submitted (under peer review):
Katalin Kelemen, Maija Dahlberg, Åsa Elmerot, Haukur Logi Karlsson, Mikael Kenno Fogde, Helle Krunke, Morten Nadim, Nicklas Pettersson, ’Exploring Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts Empirically’
Katalin Kelemen, Maija Dahlberg, Åsa Elmerot, Haukur Logi Karlsson, Mikael Kenno Fogde, Helle Krunke, Morten Nadim, Nicklas Pettersson, ’Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts: A Comparative Empirical Analysis’
If accepted, these two articles will be part of a Focus on Nordic Constitutionalism in the International Journal of Constitutional Law.
Planned:
Katalin Kelemen (ed.), Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts. An Empirical and Comparative Legal Perspective (book proposal under expert review at Hart Publishing – to be included in the Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law series) – not open access
Åsa Elmerot, ‘Constitutional reasoning in the Swedish Supreme Courts’ (in Swedish), in Svensk Juristtidning (Fall 2025) – open access
Haukur Logi Karlsson, ‘Tilvísanir íslenskra dómstóla í fræðiskrif í alþjóðlegum samanburði’ [References of Icelandic courts to scholarly works in international comparison], in Tímarit lögfræðinga (Spring 2025) – open access
Helle Krunke and Mikael Kenno Fogde, ’Constitutional reasoning in the Danish Supreme Court’ (in Danish), in Juristen (Fall 2025) – open access
Morten Nadim, ‘Constitutional reasoning in the Norwegian Supreme Court’ (in Norwegian), in Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap (Fall 2025) – open access